We are delighted to feature the three shortlisted entries from the BAFTSS Practice Research Awards. Reflecting the growing “performative” tendency of film and moving image research taking place in/through/around practice-based outputs, BAFTSS invited submissions in the following areas:
Audiovisual Practice-Research: e.g. Film/TV/video/screen-writing/moving image practice
Videographic film and moving image studies: e.g. online digital video essays / scholarly remixes
Research Applications and Infrastructure: e.g. film and television studies research-related mobile applications, online databases and archives.
The winning films were announced at the BAFTSS Annual Conference, 14 April 2016. The winner was Joanna Callaghan's Love in the Post: From Plato to Derrida, the runner up was Pratap Rughani's Justine and an honourable mention went to Philip Cowan's The Use of Color as a Function of the Cinematographer in The Sleeping-Mat Ballad.
Author: Joanna Callaghan
Format: Drama Documentary
A feature length interpretation of the ‘Envois’ section of Jacques Derrida’s book The Post Card including interviews with some of Derrida’s most esteemed readers, an unseen interview with Derrida and a fictional narrative....
Author: Pratap Rughani
A powerful film portrait of Justine, a young woman with severe neurological disorders, which develops new forms of filming and post-production based on a method of navigating the ‘art of not knowing’ with empathic looking and listening...
Author: Philip Cowan
An exploration the creative contribution of the cinematographer beyond the purely technical, challenging our understanding of authorship in film in relation to the filming of Judith Weir's Sleeping-Mat Ballad for Welsh National Opera...
The work was judged by a panel of peer experts using the criteria outlined in the research statement.
Dr Sarah Atkinson (King's College London)
Dr Sarah Barrow (University of Lincoln)
Dr Charlotte Crofts (University of the West of England)
Dr Catherine Grant (University of Sussex)
Each volume of Screenworks is published on a rolling basis. This means that in the spirit of reactive online publishing we will review and publish work as it comes in, rather than waiting for a full Volume before publication. We are still seeking entries for Volume 6. Please go to oursubmissions page to download the proforma and guidelines on the submisison process. The final deadline for Volume 6 is 1 September 2016.
If you are interested in joining our peer-review panel, then please email us at email@example.com with "Screenworks Reviewer" in the subject and attach a brief bio and an outline of the areas you are interested in reviewing.
This volume is presented in association with the British Association of Film, Television and Screen Studies.
Welcome to the new website for Screenworks – the peer-reviewed online publication of practice research in film and screen media, edited by Dr Charlotte Crofts and Associate Editor, Dr Steve Presence, both based at the University of the West of England (UWE) Bristol. Screenworks publishes practice research that produces new knowledge in Communication, Media and Cultural Studies, Art and Design, Performing Arts and related fields. We offer a forum for the dissemination and discussion of practice research that includes space for reflection on research contexts. Work is published alongside a research statement, which offers a ‘route map’ of the research process, together with two anonymous reviews, which provide critical feedback on both the work itself and its research context.
We are now accepting submissions for Volume 6 – please see the submissions page for further information on deadlines, the peer review process and how to submit your work. Click on the slideshow below to view recent work, or click on the Volumes on the left to explore the full supporting research statements and peer reviews for each volume.
What is unique about Screenworks is that the work is subject to academic peer review, just as an academic journal article would be, thus providing evidence of the impact, significance, originality and rigour of the practice as research. In addition we operate an open review policy, where peer reviews are published alongside the research statement so that the review process is transparent. Our intention is to create a supportive, yet rigourous research environment for the academic community researching screen media through practice, whilst at the same time engaging with wider audiences.
Screenworks was originally convened in 2006 by Professor Jon Dovey, and Associate editor, Dr Charlotte Crofts, and took the form of a DVD that was distributed with The Journal of Media Practice by Intellect Books. Vol 1 was published with JMP (8: 2), Autumn 2007, and Vol 2 went out with JMP (9:3), December 2008. Extracts of the works in Vols 1 & 2 have been migrated online, where possible, when the website was relaunched under the banner of JMPScreenworks.com at the JMP Symposium 2011.
Screenworks has recently been migrated once again to the present website in 2016. We now publish exclusively online in order to disseminate work more widely, save costs and to fulfil the current AHRC and REF research agendas of open access, impact and public engagement. We are hoping that this new home will enable Screenworks to continue to flourish and grow as both an online publisher of academic film and as a forum for championing screen media practice research with in the academy.
We invite submissions of moving image work on film, video and new media platforms. Where submissions are documentation of interactive or installation work we encourage producers to consider the problems of documentation as part of the research process. We welcome work from doctoral students and post doctoral researchers, as well as those at the cutting edge of practice research both nationally and internationally.
Each volume of Screenworks is published as a rolling publication. This means that in the spirit of reactive online publishing we will review and publish work on a rolling basis as it comes in, rather than waiting for a full Volume before publication.
We feel strongly that the function of Screenworks is to provide an opportunity for practice research to undergo the equivalent rigorous peer-review process to that of traditional publication, and fully understand contributors’ need to evidence the impact and significance of their practice as research.
Videos or video documentation of other screen practice must be uploaded on Vimeo.com, even if they are available online elsewhere. If you do not already have an account, you will need to join, upload and, if necessary password protect your film using the privacy settings. Please see the Vimeo/Help/Compression page for guidance on optimising your video for Vimeo. You will then include the URL and the password on the Submission Form. Only if and when your work is accepted for publication will we make it available on the JMPScreenworks.com website, as an embedded Vimeo file. Please note that, should your work be accepted for publication you will need to make it Public in the privacy settings to allow us to embed it into our website.
If your work is web-based, then simply supply the URL for review purposes.
If your work takes any other form (e.g. an app, screen-based art installation or performance) or you have a problem with uploading it on to Vimeo, then please contact us to arrange an alternative review method.
We are keen to showcase as many pieces of high quality screen media research as we can. Again, where submissions are documentation of interactive or installation work we encourage contributors to consider the problems of documentation as part of the research process.
Statements of up to 2000 words should outline Research Questions, Context, Methods, Outcomes and Impact using the Submission Form – although we also welcome the development of alternative ways of writing about practice which can identify new knowledge, research contexts and rigour – as long as they clearly identify the research in your submission.
There are many different kinds of screen media practice research. Our aim is to generate “new knowledge” in Communication, Media and Cultural Studies, Art and Design, Performing Arts and related fields. The purpose of the statement is not to “explain” the screenwork, but rather to offer a “route map” of the research process, as well as a means to provide evidence for the dissemination and wider impact of the practice.
All work submitted to Screenworks undergoes rigourous peer review, based on initial editor screening and refereeing by at least two anonymous referees.
The submission process is that contributors should submit work via Vimeo and email the URL, plus a 2000-word supporting research statement that situates the work within a research context.
Both the statement and the work are then subject to open but anonymous peer review selected from the Screenworks academic reviewers representing scholar practitioners working across the field of screen media both in the UK and internationally. Reviewers will have the choice of recommending publication of both work and research statement, acceptance of work with minor rewrites of statement required, invitation to resubmit both in reworked form or of rejecting. In the case of selected work, the 500-word reviews will be published online at JMPScreenworks.com, alongside the screenwork itself and supporting research statement.
The aim is that through this process criteria for research will be generated by the community over a period of time – that we will use a dialogic model of criteria generation and research. The process of open reviewing is intended to promote an active, concrete dialogue within the community of screen media scholar practitioners as to how our research is constituted, defined and disseminated.
Volume 6 is now open for submissions. We warmly encourage submissions on a rolling basis.
Submissions should be emailed to firstname.lastname@example.org, with “Screenworks Submission” in the subject line – with the 2000-word supporting research statement attached as a Word .doc, including a live URL to the screenwork itself on Vimeo, with password where necessary. For further guidelines please download the Screenworks Submission Form (Word .doc)
|Professor John Adams||University of Bristol|
|Judith Aston||University of the West of England|
|Sarah Atkinson||King’s College, London|
|Sarah Barrow||University of Lincoln|
|Professor Des Bell||Queens University, Belfast|
|Mick Broderick||Murdoch University, Perth|
|Inga Burrows||University of Glamorgan|
|Joanna Callaghan||University of Sussex|
|David Chapman||University of East London|
|Nick Cope||University of Sunderland|
|Charlotte Crofts||University of the West of England|
|Dr Jill Daniels||University of East London|
|Professor Andrew Dewdney||London South Bank University|
|Professor Jonathan Dovey||University of the West of England|
|Tony Dowmunt||Goldsmiths College|
|Annie Goldson||University of Auckland|
|Catherine Grant||University of Sussex|
|Amy Hardie||Brunel University|
|Matthew Hawkins||Coventry University|
|Lina Khatib||Royal Holloway University, London|
|Professor Erik Knudsen||University of Bournemouth|
|Gillian Leahy||University of Technology, Sydney|
|Alisa Lebow||Brunel University|
|Cahal Mclaughlin||Queens University, Belfast|
|Gail Pearce||Royal Holloway University, London|
|Steve Presence||University of the West of England|
|Mandy Rose||University of the West of England|
|Michael Renov||University of Southern California|
|Suzanne Stich||University of Ulster|
|Joram Ten Brink||University of Westminster|
|Lizzie Thynne||University of Sussex|
|Sarah Turner||University of Kent|
|Frank Verano||University of Sussex|
|Mike Wayne||Brunel University|
We are very keen to expand our pool of academic reviewers, particularly in terms of international scope, so if you would be interested in getting involved then please email with “Screenworks Reviewer” in the subject line, outlining your area of interest / expertise and your institutional affiliation.